Teams

Borsh

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-16vs Hall/SampsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesArienne Mahieu / Monica Brenneman vs Ursulla McLeod / Chung Kim6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJo Borsh / Lisa Yazdani vs Marjorie Guroff / Renee Jenkins-Woodard6-3, 6-2
2023-03-10vs Wise AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesBronwen Williams / Katherine Dodson vs CLAUDIA BLACKBURN / Lynette Coyne6-1, 6-3
2023-02-28vs Norbeck NettersLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeghan Smith / Franca Savvas vs Tracy Brandt / Lindsay Vilardo4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-02-24vs Wise AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Yazdani / Bronwen Williams vs Melissa Cobb / Cara Hur6-1, 6-3
2023-02-09vs Hall/SampsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesArienne Mahieu / Meghan Smith vs Chung Kim / Ursulla McLeod6-2, 6-4
2023-02-03vs Manor 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Bronwen Williams vs Christine Kluh / Laura Davis6-1, 6-1
2023-01-17vs Wise AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesArienne Mahieu / Meghan Smith vs Kelley Stone / CLAUDIA BLACKBURN6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Laurel Murphy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-11vs Kensington AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeaghan Curry / Meghan Smith vs Debi Palmer / Margaret Cornelius7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Meaghan Curry
published 3.5
3.47
Meghan Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.30
Arienne Mahieu
published 3.5
3.29
Monica Brenneman
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
3.27
Denise Levis
published 3.5
Debbie Glynn
published 3.5
3.21
Alison Ewing
published
3.15
Katherine Dodson
published
3.07
Michelle Ballman
published
2.95
Lisa Yazdani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Judie Fien-Helfman
published
2.73
Bronwen Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jo Borsh
published
Laura Narvaiz
published
Laurel Murphy
published
Rosemary Oshinsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meaghan Curry + Meghan Smith11169% games+8.3% vs expected
Meghan Smith + Denise Levis3450% games+4.5% vs expected
Monica Brenneman + Meghan Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Meaghan Curry
84W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Meghan Smith
160W–93L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Arienne Mahieu
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Monica Brenneman
46W–30L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Denise Levis
131W–88L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Debbie Glynn
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Alison Ewing
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Katherine Dodson
44W–68L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
Michelle Ballman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Lisa Yazdani
67W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
Judie Fien-Helfman
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Bronwen Williams
109W–99L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Jo Borsh
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Narvaiz
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurel Murphy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rosemary Oshinsky
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.