Teams

Bull

2023 Baltimore Adult 18 & Over · Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-05vs AkcamLost 01
L#2 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Maneesha Ahluwalia0-6, 0-6
2023-06-09Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Elena Torchia3-6, 0-6
2023-06-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Joyce Lin2-6, 2-6
2023-05-23vs AkcamLost 01
L#2 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Briana Stine2-6, 4-6
2023-05-20Won 10
W#2 SinglesChristine Hammann vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-11vs AkcamLost 01
L#2 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Briana Stine3-6, 0-6
2023-04-17Won 10
W#2 SinglesChristine Hammann vs Ashley Munchel6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Karin Davis
published
3.26
3.24
Diane Carson
published 3.5
3.22
Ashley Archibald
published 3.5
2.80
Christine Hammann
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 3
Laura Bull
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karin Davis
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Elisabeth Garcia-Wade
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Diane Carson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Ashley Archibald
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Christine Hammann
84W–47L career · 14 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
Laura Bull
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.