Teams

SFV - Calabasas Sings

2024 Team Singles 18+ SFV Winter · SFV 18+ Men 4.5 Singles

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Men 4.5 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
David Tovar
published 4.5
4.12
Jaime Barajas
published
3.94
Rob Stone
published
3.80
Tefft Smith
published
3.77
Stever Leung
published
Geoffrey Rouss
published
Mark Rusak
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Tovar
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
Jaime Barajas
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
4.12
Rob Stone
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94
Tefft Smith
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.80
Stever Leung
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Geoffrey Rouss
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Rusak
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.