Teams

Moran - Drumlins

Men's Interclub · C

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-08vs Team AloloLost 01
L#2 Male DoublesMatthew Harvey / James Bennett vs Kagey Nicholas / Steve Dorus5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-25vs SFTC - WallensteinWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesJames Bennett / Matthew Harvey vs Adolfo Gonzalez Garza / Jay Lee3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-25vs Team AloloWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesJames Bennett / Michael Passalacqua vs Kevin Mann / Nate Franz6-0, 6-3
2026-01-28vs Manlius YMCA CWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesJames Bennett / Matthew Harvey vs Jonathan Bischof / Wei Lee6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-14Won 10
W#2 Male DoublesMatthew Harvey / James Bennett vs Kevin Mann / Seth Jolly6-0, 6-1
2025-12-17Won 10
W#1 Male SinglesJames Bennett vs Raymond Tapio4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-11-12Won 10
W#2 Male DoublesMatthew Harvey / James Bennett vs Seth Jolly / Kevin Mann6-1, 6-1
2025-10-15vs Manlius YMCA CLost 02
L#1 Male SinglesJimmy Lien vs Prashant Kaul5-7, 0-6
L#2 Male DoublesJake Massaro / James Bennett vs Thomas Umina / John Sun3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for C have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Haozheng Du
published 4
3.34
C Thomas Hogge
usually #1 Male Singles 42%, also #1 Male Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.34
Michael Passalacqua
published
3.33
Stephen Nesspor
usually #1 Male Doubles 67%, also #2 Male Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Matthew Harvey
usually #2 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Doubles 38% · published
2.86
James Bennett
usually #2 Male Doubles 88%, also #1 Male Singles 13% · published 3
Jimmy Lien
usually #1 Male Singles 100% · published
Michael Moran
published
Ole Westergaard
published
Reza Hosseini
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Bennett + Matthew Harvey4166% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Nesspor + Matthew Harvey224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Haozheng Du
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
C Thomas Hogge
9W–4L career · type S · 12 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
Michael Passalacqua
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Stephen Nesspor
84W–130L career · 18 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Matthew Harvey
23W–42L career · 16 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
James Bennett
9W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
Jimmy Lien
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michael Moran
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ole Westergaard
41W–30L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Reza Hosseini
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.