Teams

The Pixies

2022 Summer Smash Doubles · Womens 3.0

2 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-07vs Sweet & SpicyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Emily Fisher vs Maile Kim / Randi Rombs2-6, 1-6
2022-07-22vs Shafer/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Emily Fisher vs Staci Shafer / Zenaida Camacho2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-21vs Baby's Got BackhandLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Emily Fisher vs Tisha Zagaroli / Wendy Walker3-6, 5-7
2022-07-19vs Crystal DulaLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Emily Fisher vs Crystal Dula / Karen Isbell2-6, 1-6
2022-07-16vs Serves You RightWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Emily Fisher vs Kathy Collins / Elena Willging3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-27vs Causing a RacketLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Fisher / Julie Rodeck vs Emily Garmon / Ann Gerson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Emily Fisher
published 3
2.51
Julie Rodeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Fisher
26W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Julie Rodeck
84W–110L career · 6 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.