Teams

Slice Queens

2026 Prince Georges Adult 18-39 · Prince Georges Adult 18-39 6.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-15vs LoVVSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesJasmine Miles / Brittney Owens vs Esme Rogers / Dhivya Rani Shankaran4-6, 2-6
W#3 Female DoublesKristen LaCherra / Abigail Strayer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-08-01vs LoVVWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesJasmine Miles / Laura Pinsky vs SHAMEKA JENNINGS / Dhivya Rani Shankaran6-4
W#2 Female DoublesAyanna Charles / Dana Willard vs Kimberly Smith / Dominique le Maitre6-0, 6-2
2026-07-25vs LoVVSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesKristen LaCherra / Paige Chapman vs Dhivya Rani Shankaran / Kimberly Smith4-6, 0-6
W#3 Female DoublesJasmine Miles / Ayanna Charles vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-19vs LoVVLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesAyanna Charles / Kayla Kabore vs SHAMEKA JENNINGS / Samantha Sherod5-7, 0-6
L#2 Female DoublesJasmine Miles / Latonya Lewis vs Esme Rogers / Brittany Jennings0-6, 4-6
2026-07-12vs LoVVLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesAyanna Charles / Natasha Abraham vs Samantha Sherod / Dhivya Rani Shankaran2-6, 4-6
L#3 Female DoublesLaura Pinsky / Kristen LaCherra vs Brittany Jennings / SHAMEKA JENNINGS4-6, 4-5
2026-06-21vs LoVVLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAyanna Charles / Jasmine Miles vs Dhivya Rani Shankaran / SHAMEKA JENNINGS6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Prince Georges Adult 18-39 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LoVV329612120
2Slice Queens236919134

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Ayanna Charles
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #3 Female Doubles 20% · published 3
2.89
Kayla Kabore
published
2.77
Dayesha Sims
published 3
2.68
Jasmine Miles
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #2 Female Doubles 20% · published 3
2.47
Laura Pinsky
published
2.46
Latonya Lewis
published
2.44
Maria Grady
published
2.44
Dana Willard
published 2.5
2.37
Paige Chapman
published
2.18
Kristen LaCherra
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.03
Brittney Owens
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ayanna Charles
32W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Kayla Kabore
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Dayesha Sims
3W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Jasmine Miles
43W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Laura Pinsky
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
Latonya Lewis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46
Maria Grady
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Dana Willard
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
Paige Chapman
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
2.5
Kristen LaCherra
23W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Brittney Owens
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.