Teams

LCTA18/Campbell/Nee/Park West

USTA 18 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-22vs LCTA18/Chapman/HamlinLost 03
L#1 DoublesDan DiNicola / Danielle Fabrega vs Austin Searight / Dede Davidson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Evans / Lisa Nee vs Chuck Wethington / Michele Chapman4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKristofer Harrison / Shannon Laing vs Dhiraj Baruah / Frances Wright0-6, 0-6
2026-06-15vs LCTA18/Lane/Snee FarmWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Cook / Dan DiNicola vs Tristin Riggin / Tyler Riggin7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDanielle Fabrega / Matt Marshall vs Liz Hambright / Dustin Hambright6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShannon Laing / Michael Evans vs Maureen Harmon / Foster Hardie7-6, 6-2
2026-06-11vs LCTA (B) 3.0M 18 & Over (Hakimi)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTammi Spruill / John Spruill vs Kelley Wilds / Matt Munoz0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDan DiNicola / Danielle Fabrega vs Liz Schreiner / Andrew Schreiner3-6, 4-6
2026-06-08vs LCTA18/Rehder/HamlinLost 12
L#1 DoublesJaclyn Cook / Dan DiNicola vs Christopher Simon / Kyrsten Morrow6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnjanette Curry / Paul Curry vs Joseph Dodson / Julia Rehder6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDanielle Fabrega / John Spruill vs Lee Odescalchi / Yann Jacquemont6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDan DiNicola / Danielle Fabrega vs Julianna Womble / Andrew Liedberg4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTammi Spruill / John Spruill vs Nathan Winters / Rebecca Hasegawa6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Nee / Michael Evans vs Lindsey Litwinowicz / Scott Litwinowicz6-0, 6-1
2026-05-11vs LCTA18/Kornahrens-Smith/MPRWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Cook / Dan DiNicola vs Alisa Mosler / Mitchell Zintel6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnjanette Curry / Paul Curry vs Georgia Krewson / Kyle Murrell6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Nee / John Spruill vs Stephanie Blonchek / Freddy Fiorillo6-3, 7-6
2026-05-04vs LCTA18/Wermuth/BrickyardWon 30
W#1 DoublesDan DiNicola / Danielle Fabrega vs Aimee Hoffman / Steve Durst6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnjanette Curry / Paul Curry vs Gretchen Looney / Tom Brown6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Nee / Matt Marshall vs Janet Winch / Shane Hoffman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA (A) 3.0M 18 & Over (Wright)701837118
2LCTA (B) 3.0M 18 & Over (Hakimi)7018310137
3LCTA18/Sweet-Stribling/Maybank611749143
4LCTA18/Chapman/Hamlin5215615149
5LCTA18/Campbell/Nee/Park West4313819177
6LCTA18/Layman/LTPDI3481328200
7LCTA18/Lybrand/St. Andrews3481328201
8LCTA18/Kornahrens-Smith/MPR2551635217
9LCTA18/Allen/LTPDI1541429199
10LCTA18/Lane/Snee Farm1631837233
11LCTA18/Brown/Doty Park0601836214
12LCTA18/Stinson-Liedberg/Hawks Nest0731836231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Paul Curry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Dan DiNicola
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.86
Anjanette Curry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Tammi Spruill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Jaclyn Cook
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Matt Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
John Spruill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Danielle Fabrega
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Lisa Nee
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Shannon Laing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Kristofer Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Peter Campbell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Nee + Matt Marshall6257% games+1.3% vs expected
John Spruill + Tammi Spruill6650% games−3.0% vs expected
Paul Curry + Anjanette Curry61541% games−4.7% vs expected
Lisa Nee + Peter Campbell1442% games−10.0% vs expected
Danielle Fabrega + Dan DiNicola134 matchesnot enough data
Jaclyn Cook + Dan DiNicola213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Curry
64W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Dan DiNicola
40W–68L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Anjanette Curry
47W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
Tammi Spruill
43W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.85
3
Jaclyn Cook
54W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.83
Matt Marshall
81W–79L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
John Spruill
44W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Danielle Fabrega
30W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Lisa Nee
51W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Shannon Laing
21W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Kristofer Harrison
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
Peter Campbell
32W–32L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.