Teams

Kiwi - McLachlan

2022 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Barlow / Stephanie Pellegrino vs Kristi Askeland / Marja Welsh4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-08-10vs Brevard - Suntree/BeanLost 01
L#2 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Tina Murphy vs Jill Mignogna / Jennifer Ledene1-6, 3-6
2022-08-03vs RCCB - SimmonsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDawn Barlow / Tina Murphy vs Karen Cornthwaite / Kim Viesins6-2, 6-4
2022-07-13vs EGYC - WelshSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDawn Barlow / Tina Murphy vs Rima Campbell / Kelly Allison6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Stephanie Pellegrino vs Alyssa Boyd / Mary McCarthy3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-06vs Brevard - Suntree/BeanWon 10
W#2 DoublesDawn Barlow / Tara Capuano vs Carmal Lewis / Sandra Rowe6-4, 6-3
2022-06-22vs Rockledge - BarhamLost 01
L#2 DoublesDawn Barlow / Barbara Burgess vs Sylvia Segura / Sara Hatfield5-7, 4-6
2022-06-15vs RCCB - RosenquistLost 02
L#2 DoublesDawn Barlow / Barbara Burgess vs Julie Cole / Sarah Hirji1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Leesa Brambach vs Rose Algiere / Gisela Alcalde3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Dawn Barlow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Amy Gregory
published 4
3.55
Cheri McLachlan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Anne Ramsey
published 3.5
3.30
Barbara Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Leesa Brambach
published
2.95
Tina Murphy
published
2.95
Tracy Famiano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheri McLachlan + Dawn Barlow2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Barlow
96W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%18%82%
4.12
4
Amy Gregory
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Cheri McLachlan
158W–138L career · 8 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Anne Ramsey
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Barbara Burgess
38W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
Leesa Brambach
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Tina Murphy
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Tracy Famiano
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
Stephanie Pellegrino
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.