Teams

Higbee/18's/3.0/PAC Night

2026 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Ariana Petrell-thomas
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.85
Kristin Higbee
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
2.78
Beth Almond
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.65
Ellen Sweetman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
2.54
Diane Matherne
usually #3 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.33
Addie Troxclair
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Jamie Vogel
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Katherine Gristina
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Kathie Daigle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Maite Cardoso
usually #3 Doubles 28%, also #1 Singles 28% · published
Megan Baum
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Taylor Roessler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Matherne + Beth Almond7356% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Sweetman + Kathie Daigle4351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ariana Petrell-thomas
12W–2L career · type D · 9 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kristin Higbee
23W–20L career · 16 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Beth Almond
18W–16L career · 16 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Ellen Sweetman
20W–32L career · 28 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Diane Matherne
16W–21L career · 21 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Addie Troxclair
14W–12L career · 16 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Jamie Vogel
12W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katherine Gristina
14W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathie Daigle
15W–16L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maite Cardoso
5W–13L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Baum
14W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Roessler
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.