Teams

Hansen

2024 Neb. Adult 18&Over · 5.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-12vs GarciaWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcus Hansen / Sheeva Parbhu vs Stefano Blatt / Bradley Entwistle6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRazvan Grigorescu vs Jorge Chevez6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesThomas Pate / Juan Rabellino vs Mike Garcia / Davis Lawley6-2, 6-3
2024-06-01vs GarciaLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheeva Parbhu / Marcus Hansen vs Gerhard Posch / Davis Lawley3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRazvan Grigorescu vs Jorge Chevez6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLuke Backhaus / Eamon Adamson vs Bradley Entwistle / Stefano Blatt3-6, 1-6
2024-05-14vs GarciaLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcus Hansen / Razvan Grigorescu vs Cedric Willems / Christopher Aumueller4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJuan Rabellino vs Mike Garcia0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEamon Adamson / Thomas Pate vs Sebastian Florczyk / Stefano Blatt2-6, 3-6
2024-05-11vs GarciaLost 03
L#1 DoublesGabriel Cortinas / Nathan Anderson vs Davis Lawley / Gerhard Posch0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesRazvan Grigorescu vs Cedric Willems6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJuan Rabellino / Eamon Adamson vs Jorge Chevez / Stefano Blatt6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-04vs GarciaLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcus Hansen / Razvan Grigorescu vs Sebastian Florczyk / Davis Lawley3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJuan Rabellino vs Jorge Chevez3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGabriel Cortinas / Nathan Anderson vs Cedric Willems / Christopher Aumueller0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Eamon Adamson
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
4.12
Juan Rabellino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.69
Gabriel Cortinas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Luke Backhaus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marcus Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Razvan Grigorescu
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Sheeva Parbhu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Pate
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheeva Parbhu + Marcus Hansen3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eamon Adamson
37W–30L career · 8 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
4.19
Juan Rabellino
10W–16L career · 8 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
4.12
Gabriel Cortinas
49W–16L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.69
Luke Backhaus
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Marcus Hansen
12W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Razvan Grigorescu
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheeva Parbhu
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Pate
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.