Teams

Cady 2.5

2023 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 2.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesGuruprasad Ramani / Majed Hamawy vs Russell Acosta / Hunter Davis6-0, 6-2
2023-06-07vs Bryant/Newell 3.0 MenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRichard McKeon / Kostas Kolouas vs Darren House / Sanjay Vedula4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Chungchi Yao vs John Alam / Russell Acosta6-3, 6-0
2023-06-03vs Bryant/Newell 3.0 MenWon 10
W#1 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Benjamin HAYES vs John Alam / Russell Acosta6-3, 6-2
2023-05-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Chungchi Yao vs Sanjay Vedula / Darren House6-3, 6-4
2023-05-21Split 11
L#1 DoublesChungchi Yao / Kostas Kolouas vs Jason Bryant / Darren House3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-17vs Bryant/Newell 3.0 MenLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe MacHovec / Chungchi Yao vs Sanjay Vedula / Roderick Valencia2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Adnan Karimi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.00
Majed Hamawy
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.85
Benjamin HAYES
published 3
2.75
Chungchi Yao
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Richard McKeon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.26
Joe MacHovec
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Majed Hamawy + Chungchi Yao141152% games−12.8% vs expected
Majed Hamawy + Richard McKeon3643% gamesnot enough data
Chungchi Yao + Richard McKeon4445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adnan Karimi
119W–128L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–516L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Benjamin HAYES
3W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Chungchi Yao
77W–97L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 1 line in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
2.5
Joe MacHovec
24W–68L career · 1 line in 2023
0%95%5%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.