Teams

LATA40/Keckeisen/MW

2023 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.5 - Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.5 - Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Wendy Schmoyer
published
Betty Webb
published 3.5
3.10
Barbara Cross
published 3.5
3.01
Katherine Stephens
published
2.91
Jeanne Stone
published
2.91
Rita Anderson
published
2.90
Kay Chrysostom
published
2.86
Jo Norris
published
2.73
Barbara Sellers
published 3
Judith Wescott
published
Katherine Keckeisen
published
Rennie Boulware
published
Sandra Tankersley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Sellers + Jeanne Stone9852% games−1.7% vs expected
Rita Anderson + Kay Chrysostom044 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Tankersley + Betty Webb213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Schmoyer
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Betty Webb
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Barbara Cross
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Katherine Stephens
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Jeanne Stone
25W–31L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.91
Rita Anderson
2W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Kay Chrysostom
14W–30L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.90
Jo Norris
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.86
3
Barbara Sellers
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Judith Wescott
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Keckeisen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rennie Boulware
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Tankersley
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.