Teams

Fretz/Bullard-Forrest W3.0S

2023 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

19 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Amanda Forrest
published 3.5
Andrea Braxdale
published 3.5
3.16
Julie Bullard
published
3.13
Alison Colston
published 3
3.08
Erin Baldwin
published 3.5
2.96
Carrie Farrell
published 3
2.88
Lauren Morrow
published
2.79
Christie Choi
published 3
Danielle Koshak
published 3
2.66
Lu Ann Weynand
published
2.61
Loretta Keller
published
2.58
Alicia Andry
published 3
2.57
Kathleen Hoedebeck
published
2.57
Suzanne Collins
published
2.49
Pamela Gaines
published
2.44
Jackie Munoz
published 3
Katherine Albanese
published
Katherine Hawkins
published
Kristin Yankovich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Baldwin + Amanda Forrest7359% games+5.0% vs expected
Alicia Andry + Suzanne Collins0637% games−11.2% vs expected
Danielle Koshak + Erin Baldwin4260% gamesnot enough data
Julie Bullard + Amanda Forrest6061% gamesnot enough data
Loretta Keller + Kathleen Hoedebeck134 matchesnot enough data
Loretta Keller + Jackie Munoz044 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Hoedebeck + Alicia Andry044 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Andry + Jackie Munoz044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Forrest
29W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Andrea Braxdale
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Bullard
22W–20L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
3
Alison Colston
17W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Erin Baldwin
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Carrie Farrell
25W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
Lauren Morrow
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Christie Choi
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Danielle Koshak
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lu Ann Weynand
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
Loretta Keller
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Alicia Andry
3W–28L career · type A · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
Kathleen Hoedebeck
7W–21L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
Suzanne Collins
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
Pamela Gaines
5W–26L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Jackie Munoz
3W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.44
Katherine Albanese
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Hawkins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin Yankovich
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.