Teams

SD 3.5 La Jolla B&TC/ Patterson

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-12vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ SchmiedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJessica Rogge / Cari Massaad vs Christy Ward / Margaret Holland5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Patterson / Sarah Suiter vs Susan Dussault / Doris Schmied6-1, 6-1
2023-12-07vs SD LLW 3.5 Coronado TC/ KimballWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristen Patterson / Sarah Suiter vs Erin Enrico / Meagan McKissick6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCari Massaad / Jessica Rogge vs Megan West / Frida Kalach7-6, 6-3
2023-11-16vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ MonzonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKristen Patterson / Sarah Suiter vs Naomi Gallego / Kristan Hanson6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Rogge / Leslie Evans vs Irene Steinwinder / Alisa Le2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-10-26vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ SaenzWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristen Patterson / Sarah Suiter vs Viviana Rozo / TOMOKO BALKO6-3, 6-4
2023-10-19vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ PeinadoWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeslie Evans / Jessica Rogge vs Jayne Harriman / Tracy Skaddan6-2, 6-0
2023-10-12vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ NicholsLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie Evans / Jessica Rogge vs Yvonne Hwang / Christine Johnson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-09-28vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ PadillaWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristen Patterson / Sarah Suiter vs Lisa Shirley / Cynthia Hensersky6-4, 6-1
2023-09-21vs SD 3.5 Peninsula TC/ LightnerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesErica Alexander / Sarah Suiter vs Birte Lightner / Nadine Utz6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessica Rogge / Michelle Kearney vs Charlotte Francovalle / Megan Wirick-Fierro0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Sarah Suiter
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.66
Erica Alexander
published 4
3.46
Sandy Callan
published
3.38
Kristen Patterson
published
3.16
Cari Massaad
published 3.5
3.02
Jessica Rogge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Patterson + Cari Massaad134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Suiter
89W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Erica Alexander
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.66
Sandy Callan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.46
Kristen Patterson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Cari Massaad
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Jessica Rogge
30W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.