Teams

V - Las Posas Ringers

2022 USTA Adult 40 &Over - WD Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesTricia McClain / Julie Gisler vs Nicole Mitchell / Marie Smith6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-03-14vs V - Mission Oaks Parks and WreckWon 10
W#1 DoublesTricia McClain / Julie Gisler vs Wendy Williams / Julie Kurowski6-3, 6-3
2022-03-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Gisler / Robin Alimena vs Leslie Wright / Diane Covington6-0, 6-3
2022-02-03vs V - Mission Oaks Parks and WreckLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandy Schomaker / Julie Gisler vs Kristin Casanova / Denise Bolish1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Tracee Nilsson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Cindy Giammarrusco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Tera Williams
published
3.24
Jaimee Seay
published 3.5
3.24
Amy Galan
published 3.5
3.20
Julie Gisler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Jill Spasiano
published
3.19
Shannon Price
published
3.15
Kelly Deardorff
published
3.07
Mariana Schindler
published
3.07
Laura Kiker
published
2.63
Dee Ann Emami
published 3
Lisa Weckbacher
published
Tricia McClain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Gisler + Kelly Deardorff4168% games+5.8% vs expected
Tera Williams + Jaimee Seay6256% games+5.1% vs expected
Julie Gisler + Tracee Nilsson4457% gamesnot enough data
Amy Galan + Shannon Price123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tracee Nilsson
52W–89L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Cindy Giammarrusco
44W–69L career · 1 line in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Tera Williams
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jaimee Seay
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Amy Galan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Julie Gisler
124W–126L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Jill Spasiano
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Shannon Price
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Kelly Deardorff
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Mariana Schindler
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.07
Laura Kiker
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Dee Ann Emami
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Lisa Weckbacher
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tricia McClain
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.