Teams

DAC/Starnes-Griffin W3.0

2023 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.21 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for W3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Megan Fellman
published
3.51
Jennifer Willson
published
3.39
Leigh Ann Griffin
published
3.38
Shannon DeVilbiss
published
3.35
Lindsey Starnes
published
3.29
Erin Basden
published 3.5
3.28
Hilary Dooley
published 3.5
3.23
Jacy Russell
published 3.5
3.17
Mary Glenn
published
3.16
Ashlea Bennett
published 3.5
3.06
Pallavi Gaitonde
published
3.06
Mary Hope Burns
published
2.83
Glenda Fodge
published 3
2.74
Hannah Estes
published 3
2.48
Joli Shaw
published
2.32
Connie Baird
published 2.5
Karrah Gagnon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Glenn + Leigh Ann Griffin3446% games−9.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Fellman
35W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
Jennifer Willson
28W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
Leigh Ann Griffin
28W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Shannon DeVilbiss
21W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Lindsey Starnes
44W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Erin Basden
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Hilary Dooley
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Jacy Russell
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Mary Glenn
24W–21L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Ashlea Bennett
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Pallavi Gaitonde
26W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.06
Mary Hope Burns
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Glenda Fodge
19W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Hannah Estes
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Joli Shaw
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Connie Baird
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%92%8%
2.32
Karrah Gagnon
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.