Teams

LTA-Q ORANGE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-14vs MEA TEALWon 40
W#1 DoublesTimolyn Esson / Carol Bradford vs Kathleen Lupo / Mary Kaiser6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGretchen Blair vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Elizabeth Korniczky vs Curry Rosato / Nikki Boye5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJean Crawford / Lydia Wuensch vs Sara Oclassen / Anna Lull6-4, 6-4
2026-07-07vs BRMST BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesDiana Hefner / Lisa Tran vs Michele Gosselin / Claudia Booton6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMona Jones vs Meghan Vogel6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Sue Vanderberg / Denise Belton6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJean Crawford / Lydia Wuensch vs Laura Tedesco / Jill Long1-0
2026-06-30vs CVTA TEALWon 31
L#1 DoublesKelly Mcreynolds / Lydia Wuensch vs Allegra Perry / Danielle Murphy6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGretchen Blair vs Liz Downey3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Bradford / Timolyn Esson vs Jennifer Ufland / Heidi Warriner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMona Jones / Elizabeth Korniczky vs Michelle Pulley / Stephanie Mockler4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-23vs NJ YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesLydia Wuensch / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Shannon Tapia / Mary Nelson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGretchen Blair vs Kristin Williams4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Hefner / Lisa Tran vs Barbara Everard / Morgan Cox6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJean Crawford / Carol Bradford vs Sandra Lucero Jacquez / Melissa Rhen6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2026-06-16vs LTA-Q REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCarol Bradford / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Anita Taylor / Christina Finkel6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMona Jones vs Emily Pieper4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Tran / Jean Crawford vs Monica Blanco / Cara Hoving5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Korniczky / Paula Nelsen vs Heather Smith / Tolley Sink5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-02vs LTA-A BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarol Bradford / Timolyn Esson vs Jacy Bowers / Sara Fedorka2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGretchen Blair vs Emily Dietrick6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLydia Wuensch / Kim Kadlic vs Lindsey Cheney / Kathy Philipp7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Tran / Diana Hefner vs Ursula Scarano / Pamela Heiden6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Gretchen Blair
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.99
Lisa Tran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.97
Carol Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.95
Diana Hefner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Kelly Mcreynolds
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Jean Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Timolyn Esson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Elizabeth Korniczky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Kim Kadlic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Mona Jones
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Paula Nelsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Lydia Wuensch
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Nelsen + Elizabeth Korniczky15758% games+1.3% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Lydia Wuensch4448% games−2.2% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Kelly Mcreynolds7362% games−5.1% vs expected
Kelly Mcreynolds + Lydia Wuensch8953% games−9.0% vs expected
Lydia Wuensch + Kim Kadlic2343% games−11.7% vs expected
Jean Crawford + Elizabeth Korniczky314 matchesnot enough data
Timolyn Esson + Carol Bradford224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Mcreynolds + Elizabeth Korniczky404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gretchen Blair
37W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
Lisa Tran
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Carol Bradford
16W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Diana Hefner
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Kelly Mcreynolds
127W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Jean Crawford
82W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Timolyn Esson
38W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Elizabeth Korniczky
59W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Kim Kadlic
45W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Mona Jones
20W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Paula Nelsen
85W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Lydia Wuensch
65W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.