Teams

AD-N

2021 DC Adult 18 & Over Summer · Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.22 / WASHINGTON D.C.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesJoan Devore vs Grace Kim6-4, 2-2
2021-05-01vs GamettesLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoan Devore / Karen Hammond vs Grace Gourdine / Obire Owinje5-7, 1-4
2021-04-24vs YMYMLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Milligan / OLUSEYI GEORGE vs Ruxandra Badiu / Emily Barry2-6, 3-6
2021-04-18vs Chicks with SticksWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoan Devore / Julia Cusick vs Helen Zassypkina / Margaret Roberts7-6, 2-2
2021-04-17vs Kevin AlexanderLost 01
L#3 DoublesChelbe Williams / Denise Milligan vs Bethlehem Addis / Saxon Henderson2-6, 4-5
2021-04-10vs GamettesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesOLUSEYI GEORGE / Denise Milligan vs Sherri Colston / Anjali Garg6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesOctavia Johnson / Joan Devore vs Staci Steward / Caitlin Bergo3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-04-03vs YMYMLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Milligan / Jacinda Johnson vs Ruxandra Badiu / Cynthia Rapp0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jacinda Johnson
published 3.5
3.36
Hannah Yoo
published 3.5
Ashley GRizzle
published 3.5
3.19
Elizabeth Plaza
published 3.5
3.01
Julia Cusick
published
2.99
Denise Milligan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Chelbe Williams
published 3
2.67
Sheryl Young
published
2.63
Joan Devore
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.61
Lekeisha Terrell
published
2.50
Gail Taylor
published 3
OLUSEYI GEORGE
published
Octavia Johnson
published
Vene Lagon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Devore + OLUSEYI GEORGE5254% games+1.5% vs expected
Gail Taylor + Chelbe Williams224 matchesnot enough data
Chelbe Williams + Joan Devore303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacinda Johnson
37W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Hannah Yoo
97W–73L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Ashley GRizzle
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Plaza
9W–20L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Julia Cusick
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Denise Milligan
41W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Chelbe Williams
45W–34L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Diana Williams Gibau
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sheryl Young
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Joan Devore
48W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
2.63
Lekeisha Terrell
14W–24L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Gail Taylor
12W–13L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
2.50
OLUSEYI GEORGE
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Octavia Johnson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vene Lagon
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.