Teams

GEPTA/Bordier/40&over/8.0MX

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Austin Allen
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 4
3.23
Berenice Loubet
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
Edgar Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Erika Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Erika Licon
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Genevieve Pendergras
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Joseph Isaac
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Juan Uraga
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Melissa Isaac
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published
Michael Bezemek
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Michael Kotowski
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Rene Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Zulem Bordier
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zulem Bordier + Erika Licon9457% games+11.1% vs expected
Rene Herrera + Austin Allen28560% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bezemek + Michael Kotowski6064% gamesnot enough data
Zulem Bordier + Michael Kotowski3354% gamesnot enough data
Austin Allen + Erika Delgado3259% gamesnot enough data
Michael Kotowski + Erika Licon4167% gamesnot enough data
Rene Herrera + Erika Delgado404 matchesnot enough data
Juan Uraga + Melissa Isaac303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Austin Allen
152W–47L career · 31 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
3.5
Berenice Loubet
32W–31L career · 16 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Edgar Ruiz
41W–35L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erika Delgado
107W–52L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erika Licon
75W–59L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Genevieve Pendergras
68W–38L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Isaac
45W–26L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Juan Uraga
89W–29L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
45W–31L career · 36 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Isaac
107W–104L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Bezemek
96W–84L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Kotowski
125W–48L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rene Herrera
49W–19L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zulem Bordier
95W–63L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.