Teams

DGarretson/Gray/LR/BP

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 2.5 Novice · 2.5 Novice - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-07vs Bryan/Stark/GHSLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Grice / Sarah Yelenich vs Andrea Baker / Logan Ann Goff3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Suits / Mallory Floyd vs Holly Heer / Emily Garza0-6, 4-6
2025-05-05vs Kiker/Traskwood/RebLost 01
L#1 DoublesSherri Brewer / Allison Suits vs Terri Livingston-Campbell / Rosa Calhoun3-6, 1-6
2025-05-01vs Cole/Nankervis/LR/OCWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Suits / Sarah Yelenich vs Julie Adami / Peyton Mills6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-24vs Gray/DGarretson/LR/RebWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Suits / Mallory Floyd vs Amy Blake / Robin Gann6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-16vs Kiker/Traskwood/RebWon 20
W#1 DoublesMallory Floyd / Allison Suits vs Shelby Kiker / Jordan Malone1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Yelenich / Katie Grice vs Reagan Adams / Sara Booker7-6, 6-0
2025-04-14vs Gray/DGarretson/LR/RebWon 10
W#1 DoublesMallory Floyd / Allison Suits vs Amy Blake / Robin Gann6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-10vs Cole/Nankervis/LR/OCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDanielle Afsordeh / Allison Suits vs Julie Adami / Karolyn Baker3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMallory Floyd / Sarah Yelenich vs Jade Parsley / Constance Lovelace7-6, 6-3
2025-03-31vs Bryan/Stark/GHSLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllison Suits / Amber Kellogg vs Mellisa Bryan / Lonnie Stark1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSherri Brewer vs Lynn Cleveland0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Novice - Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bryan/Stark/GHS80231259
2DGarretson/Gray/LR/BP3561840263
3Gray/DGarretson/LR/Reb0631531203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Deanna Garretson
published 3.5
2.39
Katie Grice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.20
Sarah Yelenich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.88
Allison Suits
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 2.5
Amber Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Danielle Afsordeh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mallory Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Sherri Brewer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mallory Floyd + Allison Suits314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deanna Garretson
33W–48L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Katie Grice
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
Sarah Yelenich
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Allison Suits
7W–11L career · type S · 8 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Amber Kellogg
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Danielle Afsordeh
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mallory Floyd
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherri Brewer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.