Teams

PD55/Huggins/BYP

2023 STA Adult Combo 55 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Jeannie Gainey
published
3.08
Gee Whetsel
published 3.5
3.04
Kellie Braddock
published
2.81
Jane Ponder
published
2.75
Deborah Griggs
published 3
2.69
Terrie Reames
published
2.60
Nancy Huggins
published
2.57
Barbara Lee
published 3
2.53
Renee Douglas
published
Marla Prozzi
published
Stephanie Light
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Griggs + Terrie Reames3548% games−1.0% vs expected
Jeannie Gainey + Kellie Braddock8852% games−4.9% vs expected
Jeannie Gainey + Gee Whetsel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeannie Gainey
24W–28L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Gee Whetsel
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
Kellie Braddock
15W–24L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jane Ponder
16W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Deborah Griggs
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.75
Terrie Reames
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Nancy Huggins
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Barbara Lee
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
Renee Douglas
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
2.53
Marla Prozzi
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Light
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.