Teams

Escambia/Gonzalez/8.5/Women

2022 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-07vs Greene - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaudia Simmons / Arlene Doyle vs Charlotte Stark / Tara McCarthy6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Jennifer Passeretti vs Mary Jane Evertz / Melissa Paravalos6-2, 7-5
2022-11-30vs Crooke - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaudia Simmons / Arlene Doyle vs Shaner Garner Crooke / Jena Wise6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Shellie McCall vs Susan Nitterauer / Angela Stewart6-2, 6-1
2022-11-16Lost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Simmons / Jennifer Passeretti vs Shelby Greene / Amber Fletcher4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Bradford / Lauren Haack vs Mary Jane Evertz / Melissa Paravalos6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-11-09vs Crooke - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Shellie McCall vs Michelle Covell / Carly Russell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Haack / Renee Bradford vs Ashle Tran / Jami Steinmetz3-6, 4-6
2022-10-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesArlene Doyle / Claudia Simmons vs Shelby Greene / Amy Harrison6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claudia Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.38
Lori Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.34
Carel Demanss
published 4.5
4.17
Lauren Haack
published
4.06
Arlene Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.03
Jennifer Passeretti
published
3.91
Shellie McCall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Renee Bradford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Whitney Sumrall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Gonzalez + Shellie McCall11267% gamesnot enough data
Lori Gonzalez + Claudia Simmons6451% gamesnot enough data
Renee Bradford + Shellie McCall5359% gamesnot enough data
Arlene Doyle + Renee Bradford7066% gamesnot enough data
Arlene Doyle + Shellie McCall5258% gamesnot enough data
Arlene Doyle + Whitney Sumrall303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Claudia Simmons
159W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Gonzalez
128W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Carel Demanss
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.34
Lauren Haack
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Arlene Doyle
116W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
4.06
Jennifer Passeretti
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Shellie McCall
158W–68L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
Renee Bradford
134W–163L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Whitney Sumrall
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.