Teams

SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18MX7.0B

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-09vs VALLEY CHURCH 18MX7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesGuancong Jia / Qiuyun Lin vs He Lu / Elma Wang6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
David Lao
published 4
4.01
Sikai Huang
published
3.91
Jiawen Song
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Jiajie Li
published
3.86
Hao Wang
published 4
3.85
Wilson Chen
published
Guancong Jia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Puhe Liang
published
3.64
Nan Sun
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Lufei Wang
published
3.43
Ziwei Wang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Shiyao Qu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Chengshu Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Fiona Li
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Chenyi Shi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ellen Xiao
published 3.5
3.21
Qiao Zhou
published
3.21
Jingchun Wu
published
3.09
Qiuyun Lin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shiru CAO
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tianyu Gu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
YUCHEN HUANG
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Lao
24W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
Sikai Huang
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
Jiawen Song
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
Jiajie Li
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Hao Wang
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
Wilson Chen
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Guancong Jia
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Puhe Liang
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.73
Nan Sun
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Lufei Wang
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Ziwei Wang
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Shiyao Qu
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Chengshu Li
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Fiona Li
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Chenyi Shi
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ellen Xiao
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Qiao Zhou
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.21
Jingchun Wu
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Qiuyun Lin
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.09
Shiru CAO
10W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tianyu Gu
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
YUCHEN HUANG
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.