Teams

GCC- Blount Love Wins (6.5 18s)

2023 Coastal Plains Combo 18 & over · 6.5 Combo Women 18 & over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-01vs GR-Taylor (C 18s 6.5W)Won 10
W#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Kerry Smith vs Abbey Strickland / Lauren Turbeville6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Kerry Smith vs Maggie Warren / Jan Mizelle6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-09-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Pons / Corinne Haywood vs Megan Parker / Lauren Horton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-20vs GR-Taylor (C 18s 6.5W)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAzita Movahed / Corinne Haywood vs Lauren Turbeville / Ani Best5-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Azita Movahed vs Helen Tyson / Malin Soreff7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Monica Carlson
published
3.49
Corinne Haywood
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Diane Pons
published 3.5
Amanda Bonds
published 3.5
3.24
Jessie Massey
published
3.22
Kimberly Kuhn
published
3.20
Azita Movahed
published 3.5
3.04
Linda Roberson
published
2.81
Nicole Blount
published
2.70
KENNEDY BLOUNT
published
Maryann Cuellar
published
Michelle Litchfield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Pons + Monica Carlson5263% games+21.8% vs expected
Kimberly Kuhn + Monica Carlson5553% games+0.6% vs expected
Azita Movahed + Kimberly Kuhn2349% gamesnot enough data
Linda Roberson + Azita Movahed044 matchesnot enough data
Azita Movahed + Nicole Blount134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Kuhn + Diane Pons314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Carlson
82W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%6%94%
3.71
3.5
Corinne Haywood
120W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Diane Pons
43W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Amanda Bonds
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessie Massey
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Kimberly Kuhn
28W–34L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Azita Movahed
31W–36L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Linda Roberson
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Nicole Blount
10W–22L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.81
KENNEDY BLOUNT
18W–23L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Maryann Cuellar
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Litchfield
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.