Teams

CV-LLW-PGA West/Palmieri & Waugh

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-01vs CV-Cathedral Canyon/Inder/CasamentoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesEleonora Jeans / Christine Zika vs Kristen Kilguss / Pamela Pedlow4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLyssa Vermillion vs Janet Casamento6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Waugh / PALMIERI PALMIERI vs Bianca Mahon / Jean MacHiz2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRenee Eicher / Jeanette Petersen vs Julie OLoughlin / Mary Esper6-3, 6-0
2026-02-22vs CV-Cathedral Canyon/Inder/CasamentoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesEleonora Jeans / Susan Waugh vs Mary Esper / Bianca Mahon3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLyssa Vermillion vs Kristen Kilguss6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Middleton / Jeanette Petersen vs Julie Klauer / Janet Casamento6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRenee Eicher / PALMIERI PALMIERI vs Pamela Pedlow / Rosemarie Rotunno2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesEleonora Jeans / Christine Zika vs Kristen Kilguss / Pamela Pedlow6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLyssa Vermillion vs Bianca Mahon6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Waugh / Dawn Hubbard vs Rosemarie Rotunno / Martha Spano6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRenee Eicher / Jeanette Petersen vs Roberta Dierks / Julie OLoughlin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-08vs CV-Cathedral Canyon/Inder/CasamentoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesEleonora Jeans / Susan Waugh vs Kristen Kilguss / Pamela Pedlow6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKelley Johnson vs Bianca Mahon2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Hubbard / Cynthia McDowell vs Jean MacHiz / Rosemarie Rotunno7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRenee Eicher / PALMIERI PALMIERI vs Julie Klauer / Julie OLoughlin0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSusan Waugh / Christine Zika vs Mary Esper / Kristen Kilguss6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLyssa Vermillion vs Janet Casamento6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDawn Hubbard / Cynthia McDowell vs Rosemarie Rotunno / Jean MacHiz6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPALMIERI PALMIERI / Margaret Middleton vs Julie OLoughlin / Martha Spano6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-01-18vs CV-Cathedral Canyon/Inder/CasamentoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Waugh / Christine Zika vs Kristen Kilguss / Bianca Mahon6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeanette Petersen vs Coree Carver1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesEleonora Jeans / Renee Eicher vs Mary Esper / Janet Casamento7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMargaret Middleton / Cynthia McDowell vs Jean MacHiz / Julie Klauer2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSusan Waugh / Christine Zika vs Coree Carver / Julie OLoughlin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelley Johnson vs Janet Casamento6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLyssa Vermillion / Eleonora Jeans vs Mary Esper / Laurie Lober6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPALMIERI PALMIERI / Jeanette Petersen vs Martha Spano / Jean MacHiz1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · CV Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CV-LLW-PGA West/Palmieri & Waugh61171127222
2CV-Cathedral Canyon/Inder/Casamento16111739269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Lyssa Vermillion
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Renee Eicher
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Cynthia McDowell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Margaret Middleton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Eleonora Jeans
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Susan Waugh
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.56
Christine Zika
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Jeanette Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.49
Dawn Hubbard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.29
PALMIERI PALMIERI
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kelley Johnson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Hubbard + Eleonora Jeans1741% games+4.3% vs expected
Christine Zika + Susan Waugh213 matchesnot enough data
Jeanette Petersen + Renee Eicher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lyssa Vermillion
5W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
Renee Eicher
5W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Cynthia McDowell
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Margaret Middleton
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Eleonora Jeans
5W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Susan Waugh
4W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Christine Zika
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
Jeanette Petersen
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.53
3
Dawn Hubbard
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
PALMIERI PALMIERI
3W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.29
Kelley Johnson
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.