Teams

O'Connor Campbell

2026 40 & Over Southern Combo Doubles Night - Montgomery · 8.5 Combo Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-09vs MCC ConeWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Crenshaw / Jarred Kaplan vs James Armstrong / Brian Cone6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Burke / Mitchell Powell vs Greg Alford / Todd Henderson6-3, 6-3
2026-06-29vs MCC ConeWon 20
W#1 DoublesMariano Runco / Harrison Campbell vs John O'Brien / Carlos Reyes6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Crenshaw / Stephen Nettelhorst vs Greg Alford / Jody McInnes6-2, 6-1
2026-06-24vs MCC ConeWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrandon Osborn / Bobby Trott vs Brian Cone / Carlos Reyes6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMark Caradori / Harrison Campbell vs Todd Henderson / Greg Alford6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Chris Carpenter
published 4.5
4.12
John Crenshaw
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.05
Stephen Nettelhorst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Harrison Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.89
Mitchell Powell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Jarred Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
David Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Mark Caradori
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Bobby Trott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mariano Runco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harrison Campbell + Stephen Nettelhorst3258% games−6.0% vs expected
Mitchell Powell + David Burke404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Carpenter
38W–13L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.30
John Crenshaw
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
4
Stephen Nettelhorst
146W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%35%65%
4.05
Harrison Campbell
37W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Mitchell Powell
21W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Jarred Kaplan
27W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
David Burke
35W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Mark Caradori
14W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Bobby Trott
50W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.71
Mariano Runco
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.