Teams

WAL MIONE

2026 FW USTA Adult Fall Ladies · Saturday 2.5 ladies

8 players · average NTRP 2.60 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-01vs MCL WAGNERLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbie McAnalley / Alice Stacey vs Alison Conlee / Jen Wagner1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-11vs MCL WAGNERLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbie McAnalley / Alice Stacey vs Jen Wagner / Nilza Boldenow1-6, 6-7
2025-09-27vs RID DIAZ/GROSSMANLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlice Stacey / Cindy Gardner vs CORTNEY Craft / Stefanie Goff3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Saturday 2.5 ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RID DIAZ/GROSSMAN236918137
2WAL MIONE1451021145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Apryl Henrichs
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.41
Tina Pierce
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.33
Shannon Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Ana Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.18
Jan Millhouser
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.18
Barbie McAnalley
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.10
Alice Stacey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.98
Cindy Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Lucas + Shannon Lee4259% games+12.2% vs expected
Alice Stacey + Barbie McAnalley224 matchesnot enough data
Jan Millhouser + Ana Lucas123 matchesnot enough data
Alice Stacey + Cindy Gardner033 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Gardner + Shannon Lee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Apryl Henrichs
11W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Tina Pierce
5W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Shannon Lee
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Ana Lucas
6W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Jan Millhouser
3W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Barbie McAnalley
4W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Alice Stacey
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Cindy Gardner
1W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.