Teams

IRV-Rounds/Lavietes

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Jason Bolt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.83
Bryan LaMontagne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Paul Ecker
published 3
2.68
Kevin Franck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Results5 ties
2023-06-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Bolt / Robert Grenzer vs Edwin Quick / Kenneth Powers6-2, 6-4
2023-06-10Split 11
W#1 DoublesJon Lavietes / Bryan LaMontagne vs Hao Lee / Walter Schwane6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKevin Franck vs Ryan Smith6-4, 7-5
2023-06-03Split 11
L#1 DoublesBryan LaMontagne / Kevin Chigbrow vs Dan Shue / David Hubka7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJason Bolt vs Cal Szueber6-2, 6-2
2023-05-14Won 20
W#1 DoublesBryan LaMontagne / Kevin Franck vs Jian Chen / Hao Lee6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJason Bolt vs Ali Shojania4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Bolt / Robert Grenzer vs Lonnie Dawkins / Ryan Smith6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Jason Bolt
31W–21L career
0%55%45%
3.10
3
Bryan LaMontagne
27W–31L career
1%95%4%
2.83
3
Paul Ecker
36W–49L career
0%98%1%
2.80
3
Kevin Franck
18W–33L career
3%97%0%
2.68

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.