Teams

Krudys

2023 Montgomery Adult 55 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-07-09vs IT'S AH RAPP!Won 20
W#1 DoublesShelley Puterman / Robin Khan vs Laura Haney / Andrea Motley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Hazel / Mary Beth Etherton vs Valerie Pierce / Thedra White7-5, 6-2
2023-06-29vs Fun TennisWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Hazel / Robin Khan vs Rosanne Johnston / Mayumi Ishihara1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-19vs IT'S AH RAPP!Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Rehmann / Suzanne Krudys vs Karlene Brathwaite / Jade Moore4-6, 3-6
2023-06-15vs Fun TennisLost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Rehmann / Rosalie Hooper vs Isaura H Martinez / Mayumi Ishihara4-6, 3-6
2023-06-08vs IT'S AH RAPP!Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMaureen Cook / Shelley Puterman vs Laura McNay / Laura Haney0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Li Ives vs Gloria McDowell / Jothi Nedungadi7-6, 2-4
2023-06-03vs Fun TennisLost 02
L#1 DoublesCynthia Coe / Kim Hazel vs Meaghan McHugh / Sandy Snyder0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKim Rehmann / Mary Beth Etherton vs Elizabeth Hunter / Katherine Dodson3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-05-22vs IT'S AH RAPP!Won 20
W#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Maureen Cook vs Laura McNay / Esther Wang7-5, 5-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Krudys / Christine Guelcher vs Karlene Brathwaite / Jothi Nedungadi6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-20vs Fun TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Barton-Dock / Mary Beth Etherton vs Carol Gover / Shonya Sturdivant4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-05-09vs IT'S AH RAPP!Split 11
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Krudys / Sandy Horowitz vs Marie Sokoloff / Carrie Wofford7-6, 4-5
W#3 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Li Ives vs Thedra White / Jade Moore6-3, 7-5
2023-05-06vs Fun TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Hazel / Cynthia Coe vs Sandy Snyder / Veronique Kessler1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kim Rehmann
published
3.44
Yunden Jinsmaa
published
3.35
Maureen Cook
published
3.33
Suzanne Krudys
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Shelley Puterman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Audrey Yen
published 3.5
Frances Brennan
published 3.5
3.20
Mary Barton-Dock
published
3.19
Robin Khan
published
3.18
Christine Guelcher
published 3.5
3.18
Rosalie Hooper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Sandy Horowitz
published
3.11
Li Ives
published
3.11
Mary Beth Etherton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Kim Hazel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beth Etherton + Shelley Puterman71347% games−11.2% vs expected
Suzanne Krudys + Li Ives2347% gamesnot enough data
Mary Beth Etherton + Kim Hazel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Rehmann
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Yunden Jinsmaa
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.44
Maureen Cook
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Suzanne Krudys
152W–110L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Shelley Puterman
86W–69L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Audrey Yen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Frances Brennan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Barton-Dock
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Robin Khan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christine Guelcher
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Li Ives
12W–34L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Mary Beth Etherton
141W–140L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Kim Hazel
98W–117L career · 4 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.