Teams

EXE:Nieskoski:Ignjic

2023 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Weekend · Diva 2.5

2 players · average NTRP / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-01-21vs EXE:Barwell:CarrollWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaja Ignjic / Kimberly Nieskoski vs Mandi Barwell / Heather Carroll8-4
2023-01-21vs YMCA:Mellish:SmykilWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaja Ignjic / Kimberly Nieskoski vs Jeanne Mellish / Paula Kennedy8-1
2022-12-03vs HH:Walker:WalkerWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaja Ignjic / Regina Dixon vs Heather Walker / Marissa Walker6-3, 6-2
2022-11-20vs YMCA:Gauthier:RadkeWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrenda Dickey / Maja Ignjic vs Nancy Bax / Ann Edwards6-4, 6-0
2022-11-06vs YMCA:Brunet:YankowskasWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Carroll / Kimberly Nieskoski vs Robyn Brunet / Grace Wise6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-23vs HH:Walker:WalkerWon 10
W#1 DoublesApril Malnar / Kimberly Nieskoski vs Heather Walker / Marissa Walker6-1, 6-0
2022-10-16vs YMCA:Brunet:YankowskasLost 01
L#2 DoublesApril Malnar / Maja Ignjic vs Linda Leibig / Sonya van der Meer6-7, 2-6
2022-10-01vs HH:Walker:WalkerWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Carroll / Kimberly Nieskoski vs Heather Walker / Marissa Walker6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Dickey / Maja Ignjic vs Mary Jane DRISCOLL / Jennifer Eklund1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-18vs YMCA:Wright:JamesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMandi Barwell / Kimberly Nieskoski vs Gail Nickerson / Jaynemarie Wright6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Carroll / Maja Ignjic vs Susan Jamback / Nicole James6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Diva 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Kimberly Nieskoski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maja Ignjic
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Nieskoski + Maja Ignjic4254% games+4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Nieskoski
18W–14L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maja Ignjic
24W–17L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.