Teams

Foehrkolb Singles 3.5

2026 Baltimore Singles · Baltimore Singles 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesAbraham Anonuevo vs Alex Cheng6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJon Roll vs David Sherman6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesKevin Foehrkolb vs Tyce Henry6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDavid Warren vs Alex Cheng1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesArlo Horton vs Calvin Braxton II6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesJon Roll vs Tyce Henry6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBrooks Thacker vs Ryan Clifton6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAbraham Anonuevo vs Alex Cheng6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesSoham Sen vs Perceval Singh6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSamuel Sobkov vs Ryan Clifton6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesDavid Warren vs Calvin Braxton II6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKevin Foehrkolb vs Andrew Smith6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBrooks Thacker vs Alex Cheng3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesArlo Horton vs Perceval Singh6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesSoham Sen vs Tom Cavers6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesBrooks Thacker vs Calvin Braxton II6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSamuel Sobkov vs Tom Cavers6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJon Roll vs Tyce Henry6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSamuel Sobkov vs Ryan Clifton6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDavid Warren vs Perceval Singh6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSoham Sen vs Andrew Smith6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBrooks Thacker vs Calvin Braxton II6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesArlo Horton vs Alex Cheng6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAbraham Anonuevo vs David Sherman6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Baltimore Singles 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Foehrkolb Singles 3.550150178
2Tyce - Henrys Hooligans Singles 3.50501530182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Brooks Thacker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Samuel Sobkov
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.45
David Warren
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Arlo Horton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Abraham Anonuevo
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Soham Sen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Affan Osman
published 3.5
3.21
Kevin Foehrkolb
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Jon Roll
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Foehrkolb + Jon Roll044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooks Thacker
13W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Samuel Sobkov
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
David Warren
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Arlo Horton
9W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Abraham Anonuevo
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Soham Sen
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Affan Osman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Kevin Foehrkolb
50W–90L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Jon Roll
32W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.