Teams

Harpers

2023 OH OV FALL A40&O W Cincinnati · 2023 FALL Adult 40&O 4.0W

14 players · average NTRP 3.90 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-18vs Queen City OrangeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTerri Schantz / Jessica Shafer vs Sheri Frey / Carol Johnson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGibson Purdom Arling / Sandra Lutz vs Janet Scruby / Sandra Stephens3-6, 3-6
2022-11-11vs Queen City ChromeLost 12
W#1 DoublesTerri Schantz / Jessica Shafer vs Maggie Minich / Emily Thurman7-6, 5-7, 2-0
L#2 DoublesJanice Przezdziecki / Sarah Edwards vs Tara Veith / Rachel Belcastro3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDebbie Phillips / Susan Arthur vs Paula Danis / Aimee Boettcher2-6, 0-6
2022-11-04vs Queen City RedWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary MacVittie / Terri Schantz vs Ann Roda / Ashlee Kenner7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGibson Purdom Arling / Meta Stoll vs Becky Burgbacher / Jennifer Doerger6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarole Meldon / Sandra Lutz vs Karen Firstenberger / Amy Sattler3-6, 1-6
2022-10-21vs Five Seasons KYLost 02
L#1 DoublesPam Hoynes / Jessica Shafer vs Christine Frey / Caroline Ritson6-1, 6-7, 0-3
L#2 DoublesGibson Purdom Arling / Dori Morelock vs Anne Arnsperger / Krista Mcginness0-6, 3-6
2022-10-14vs Queen City OrangeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJessica Shafer / Sarah Edwards vs Sheri Frey / Sandra Stephens6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGibson Purdom Arling / Carole Meldon vs Bethe Orlando / Donna Griffor3-6, 5-7
2022-10-07vs Queen City ChromeWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Shafer / Sarah Edwards vs Maggie Minich / Jennifer Nye6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMary MacVittie / Janice Przezdziecki vs Aimee Boettcher / Leigh Ann Schinaman6-3, 6-5
L#3 DoublesGibson Purdom Arling / Dori Morelock vs Dana Hecker / Rachel Belcastro1-6, 1-6
2022-09-30vs Queen City RedWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary MacVittie / Terri Schantz vs Ann Roda / Ashlee Kenner5-7, 6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGibson Purdom Arling / Elizabeth Wenger vs Nancy Wandtke / Mary Jo Wright6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCarole Meldon / Debbie Phillips vs Meg Argo / Becky Burgbacher2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 FALL Adult 40&O 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Meta Stoll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Jessica Shafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Terri Schantz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Wenger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Gibson Purdom Arling
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.49
Debbie Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Carole Meldon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Dori Morelock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Janice Przezdziecki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary MacVittie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pam Hoynes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Lutz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sherri Schaefer
published
Susan Arthur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary MacVittie + Terri Schantz10164% games+8.0% vs expected
Janice Przezdziecki + Pam Hoynes3259% games+4.6% vs expected
Janice Przezdziecki + Elizabeth Wenger5455% games−5.6% vs expected
Mary MacVittie + Janice Przezdziecki4349% games−9.0% vs expected
Carole Meldon + Gibson Purdom Arling1440% games−9.8% vs expected
Gibson Purdom Arling + Dori Morelock2342% games−11.2% vs expected
Pam Hoynes + Elizabeth Wenger5453% games−13.8% vs expected
Terri Schantz + Janice Przezdziecki4353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meta Stoll
32W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%64%36%
4.46
Jessica Shafer
35W–16L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
Terri Schantz
35W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Elizabeth Wenger
29W–21L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4
Gibson Purdom Arling
19W–16L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Phillips
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
4
Carole Meldon
12W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
4
Dori Morelock
3W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.29
Janice Przezdziecki
32W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary MacVittie
22W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pam Hoynes
36W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Lutz
34W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherri Schaefer
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Arthur
25W–26L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.