Teams

PL-Hayes

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 5.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Kirsi Varsa
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.98
Anne Corsano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.81
Mindy Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Results5 ties
2021-04-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesKirsi Varsa / Anne Corsano vs Mindy Blakeslee / Amy Holmes6-2, 6-2
2021-04-18Split 11
W#1 DoublesKirsi Varsa / Andrea Olson vs Kristin Gibson / Susie Heimdahl6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLindy Irving / Mindy Richardson vs Joanna Stewart / Kathryn Osborne6-0, 6-1
2021-04-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKirsi Varsa / Lindy Irving vs Ashleigh Dickinson / Kari Aggerholm6-3, 6-4
2021-04-02Split 11
W#1 DoublesKirsi Varsa / Anne Corsano vs Kristin Gibson / Beth Lehman-Brooks6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLindy Irving / Mindy Richardson vs Susie Heimdahl / Akiko Suzuki6-1, 6-4
2021-03-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesKirsi Varsa / Christine Hayes vs Kristin Gibson / Kathryn Osborne6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kirsi Varsa
81W–74L career
0%97%2%
4.26
4.5
Anne Corsano
144W–125L career
21%79%0%
3.98
4
Mindy Richardson
110W–139L career
0%99%1%
3.81

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.