Teams

Strawberries and Cream

Summer Adult 18 & Over Combo · 7.5 Ladies

17 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-01vs #1 Combo - Extra SaucyLost 03
L#1 DoublesGrace Chang / Anna Hobson vs Melissa Koshy / Kim Hoang1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Anderson / Jill Francis vs Summer Rydel / Susan Hoang2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Hay / Sarah Montgomery vs Danielle Rueda / Paige Welch1-6, 6-7
2026-07-25vs Deuce BagsWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Otten / Grace Chang vs Laura Olesen / Michelle Bourianoff6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaula Vogrin / Sophie Gillet vs Jennifer Woster / Leslie Allison6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Ladd / Amy Morino vs Rhonda Alexander / Jennie Purushothaman7-6, 1-1
2026-07-18vs Combo No.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Anderson / Jennifer Pierson vs Lauren Knox / Charliyn Tran1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Montgomery / Susannah Whelan vs SYDNEY Tang / Masyn Upchurch3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGrace Chang / Anna Hobson vs Natalie Duvall / Grace Edsel3-6, 4-3
2026-07-11vs Hit SquadLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsay McConeghy / Stephanie Anderson vs Laura Mossing / Keri Jackson5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Francis / Catherine Ladd vs Brittany Hamel / Kelly Dohn3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Hobson / Susannah Whelan vs Barbara Landrum / Priya Bhavsar6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 7.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1#1 Combo - Extra Saucy40111478
2Hit Squad317512115
3Combo No.522751199
4Deuce Bags135717123
5Strawberries and Cream133918118
6Gone with the Win 7.502061276

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Amanda Romney
published 4
3.81
Jennifer Pierson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Lindsay McConeghy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.74
Anna Hobson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.73
Paula Vogrin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.73
Heather Otten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Jill Francis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Stephanie Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.49
Susannah Whelan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Sarah Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Catherine Ladd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Danielle Walker
published 3.5
3.29
Courtney Laing
published 3.5
3.29
Grace Chang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Heather Hay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Sophie Gillet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Amy Morino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Hobson + Sarah Montgomery7160% games+16.9% vs expected
Sarah Montgomery + Amanda Romney11258% games+9.5% vs expected
Lindsay McConeghy + Jennifer Pierson411757% games+3.9% vs expected
Paula Vogrin + Lindsay McConeghy224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay McConeghy + Amanda Romney404 matchesnot enough data
Heather Otten + Anna Hobson314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Anderson + Jill Francis123 matchesnot enough data
Anna Hobson + Jennifer Pierson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Romney
86W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
4.06
Jennifer Pierson
53W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Lindsay McConeghy
90W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Anna Hobson
64W–36L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Paula Vogrin
89W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Heather Otten
45W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Jill Francis
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
Stephanie Anderson
15W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
Susannah Whelan
28W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
Sarah Montgomery
35W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Catherine Ladd
74W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Danielle Walker
29W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Courtney Laing
25W–30L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Grace Chang
19W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Heather Hay
42W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Sophie Gillet
35W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Amy Morino
32W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.