Teams

LVTA RED

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-24vs CSU GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesColby Mueller / Leslie Jamison vs Reeves Anderson / Susanna Styve3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadissen Allen / Adam Baker vs Shawn Farnell / Emily Sieg6-3, 7-5
2024-05-19vs CSU GOLDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesColby Mueller / Caryl Abeyta vs Harim Gonzalez / Erin DeCuir7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelsey Keene / Taylor Nguyen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-05vs CSU GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdam Baker / Madissen Allen vs Susanna Styve / Jesse Chavez5-7, 6-3
2024-04-28vs CSU GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesColby Mueller / Leslie Jamison vs Thomas Carson / Adeline Robinson6-4, 6-3
2024-04-14vs CSU GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesMadissen Allen / Adam Baker vs Reeves Anderson / Susanna Styve4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-07vs CSU GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesColby Mueller / Madissen Allen vs Zachary Bekkedahl / Suzanne Hale4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Sarah Lodewick
published
4.31
Madissen Allen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.29
Colby Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Kelsey Keene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Caryl Abeyta
published 4.5
4.15
Leslie Jamison
published
4.08
Kelly Blanks
published
4.03
Taylor Nguyen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelsey Keene + Colby Mueller6451% games+2.7% vs expected
Kelly Blanks + Colby Mueller213 matchesnot enough data
Madissen Allen + Taylor Nguyen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Lodewick
19W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
4.41
4.5
Madissen Allen
42W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Colby Mueller
62W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Kelsey Keene
73W–45L career · 1 line in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Caryl Abeyta
26W–27L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.21
Leslie Jamison
24W–20L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
Kelly Blanks
38W–46L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
Taylor Nguyen
18W–28L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.