Teams

Titus/Rockefeller/LR/PVCC

2026 Tri-Level 40 & Over · 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-11vs Jeter/LR/CCLRLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffani Jedlicka / Eden Raines vs Marcie Jeter / Mary Way3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Reddmann / Janna Jennings vs Ashley Younger / Natasha Vincent3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Titus / Leslie Lants vs Mary Thalheimer / Jaclyn Bracey4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-02vs Sanders/Harrison/HS/LRACLost 12
L#1 DoublesEden Raines / Meredith Reddmann vs Meritt Harrison / Jennifer Baptist7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanna Jennings / Jennifer Adkins vs Marti Henson / Margaret Hicks2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Cliff / Brittany Holt vs Mary Beth Munro / Flora Lucia De La Garza Bayon7-6, 6-4
2026-07-29vs Jeter/LR/CCLRWon 21
W#1 DoublesJenni Orahood / Dana Rodriguez vs Marcie Jeter / Jessie McLarty6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCourtney Jones / Meredith Reddmann vs Michele Brewer / Colleen Youngdahl2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Lants / Laura Titus vs Mary Thalheimer / Brittany Richardson Watson4-6, 2-6
2026-07-28vs Sanders/Harrison/HS/LRACSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJanna Jennings / Tiffani Jedlicka vs Pam Landis / Anna Rojas2-6, 6-5
W#3 DoublesNatalie Rockefeller / Ashley Cliff vs Cheryl Cooper / Deborah Bennett6-0, 6-5
2026-07-24vs Jeter/LR/CCLRLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudi Fess / Eden Raines vs Karen Koen / Mary Way6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Adkins / Tiffani Jedlicka vs Natasha Vincent / Ana Bridges4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Titus / Leslie Lants vs Mary Thalheimer / Kyla Bryant3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-12vs Sanders/Harrison/HS/LRACLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenni Orahood / Eden Raines vs Meritt Harrison / Suzanne Klug1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Reddmann / Courtney Jones vs Pam Landis / Anna Rojas6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Cliff / Brittany Holt vs Kim Worrell / Deborah Bennett7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sanders/Harrison/HS/LRAC429920151
2Titus/Rockefeller/LR/PVCC1571125189

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Eden Raines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Jenni Orahood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Dana Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.74
Meredith Reddmann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Tiffani Jedlicka
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Janna Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Leslie Lants
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Ashley Cliff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Brittany Holt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Laura Titus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Natalie Rockefeller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Adkins
published
Judi Fess
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittany Holt + Ashley Cliff5157% games+7.3% vs expected
Leslie Lants + Laura Titus251655% games+0.7% vs expected
Jenni Orahood + Eden Raines0538% games−10.7% vs expected
Natalie Rockefeller + Ashley Cliff404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eden Raines
25W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
Jenni Orahood
16W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Dana Rodriguez
5W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.95
Meredith Reddmann
39W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Tiffani Jedlicka
82W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Janna Jennings
16W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Leslie Lants
33W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Ashley Cliff
50W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Brittany Holt
24W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Laura Titus
33W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Natalie Rockefeller
44W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jennifer Adkins
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Judi Fess
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.