Teams

SOH

2023 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-06-14vs RPMWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Kim / Jin Soh vs KC Song / Boming Zhang7-5, 6-0
2023-06-06vs CJ RocksLost 01
L#1 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Matthew Poloniak6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-03vs Hit MenLost 01
L#2 DoublesJin Soh / Minchan Kim vs Brian Krantz / Dmitri Blumin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-25vs String TheorySplit 11
W#2 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Ezhilan Ulaganathan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYoung Seung Kim / Jin Soh vs David Cheo / Hari Mahadevuni2-6, 1-6
2023-05-18vs I'd Hit That 18+ 3.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesJeeho Lee / Jin Soh vs Jagannath Surampudi / Sean Alewine6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBryan Bassig / Changyoun Kim vs Tim Munshell / Edward Kwitowski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-12vs RPMWon 10
W#3 DoublesJin Soh / Bryan Bassig vs Xiao Liu / Boming Zhang6-3, 6-1
2023-05-02vs CJ RocksWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeeho Lee / Jin Soh vs Rema Pachuau / Renhuan Xu7-5, 6-3
2023-04-28vs Hit MenLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Song / Jin Soh vs Phillip Harvin / Brian Krantz4-6, 3-6
2023-04-19Split 11
W#1 DoublesJeeho Lee / Jin Soh vs Mohamed Atalla / Timothy Sprock6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBryan Bassig vs Jacob Doty1-6, 2-6
2023-04-16vs I'd Hit That 18+ 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJeeho Lee / Jin Soh vs Alexandre Fines / Dan Hunt1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Bryan Bassig
usually #1 Singles 58%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.54
Jeeho Lee
published
3.31
Chan Young Jung
published 3.5
3.28
Jaeil Ahn
published 3.5
3.27
Jin Soh
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Chris Takiar
published 3.5
3.22
Paul Song
published
3.11
Young Seung Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jin Soh + Young Seung Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryan Bassig
143W–61L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.55
Jeeho Lee
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Chan Young Jung
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Jaeil Ahn
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Jin Soh
58W–47L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Chris Takiar
14W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Song
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Young Seung Kim
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.