Teams

Isleworth-Galt

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 18 & Over ESL Fall - DAY · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.94 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnnette Horn / Candice Davis vs Donna Tan / Susan Elieff6-1, 6-2
2024-11-27vs Maitland- CooperWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Appleby / Annette Horn vs Tiffany Grindstaff / Courtney Maloney7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAmy Beaulieu / Katharine Foley vs Debbie Ason / Jamie Smith2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Strack vs Christine Samek-Yonge6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Nowak / Elizabeth Rahter vs Ning Xu / Kadriye Hasoglu2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Whitcomb / Allison Bolanovich vs Jennifer Wodi / Leslie Guerin6-3, 6-1
2024-11-01vs Maitland Tennis Club@WP-FranksLost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Appleby / Annette Horn vs Ronda Russell / Ashley Hanley3-6, 3-6
2024-10-25vs WPRC-VillagomezLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatharine Foley / Annette Horn vs Nicole Crowe / Aubrey Waters Ward6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Jessica Strack
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.90
Annette Horn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Claudine Galt
published 3
2.82
Kimberly Ehrhard
published
2.81
Katharine Foley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Ashley Appleby
published 3
Allison Bolanovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Whitcomb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Amanda Nowak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Amy Beaulieu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Rahter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Meghan Mannella
published
Noelle Siegel
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Strack
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Annette Horn
73W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Claudine Galt
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Kimberly Ehrhard
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Katharine Foley
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Ashley Appleby
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Allison Bolanovich
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Whitcomb
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Amanda Nowak
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Amy Beaulieu
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
2.5
Elizabeth Rahter
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Mannella
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Noelle Siegel
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.