Teams

Free Birds

2024 Coed Social League · 5.0 Seattle

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-19vs We Pan Boom-JaspanWon 30
W#1 Female SinglesCheryl Borgonia vs Stacy Lundstedt6-0
W#1 Male SinglesKurt Nikaitani vs Andrew Armaneous6-0
W#2 Mixed DoublesKurt Nikaitani / Meagan Milca vs David Weaver / Stacy Lundstedt5-1
2024-08-12vs Wing & HoogsWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesMeagan Milca / Cheryl Borgonia vs Abby Newbold / Malia Wing6-3
W#1 Male DoublesKurt Nikaitani / Stuart Howe vs Peter Robison / Peter Mountford6-2
2024-08-05vs Racket Scientists-UngureanasuSplit 11
W#1 Female SinglesMeagan Milca vs Ioana Ungureanasu6-5
L#1 Male DoublesStuart Howe / Kurt Nikaitani vs Mihai Petriuc / Alex Ungureanasu3-6
2024-07-22vs Wing & HoogsLost 02
L#1 Male SinglesKevin Ceder vs Peter Robison0-6
L#2 Mixed DoublesKevin Ceder / Cheryl Borgonia vs Abby Newbold / John Hogan5-6
2024-07-15vs Racket Scientists-UngureanasuLost 01
L#1 Male SinglesKevin Ceder vs Nicholas Yee0-6
2024-07-08vs We Pan Boom-JaspanWon 31
W#1 Female DoublesMeagan Milca / Cheryl Borgonia vs Stacy Lundstedt / Jennifer Sei6-2
W#1 Female SinglesMeagan Milca vs Stacy Lundstedt6-0
L#1 Male DoublesKurt Nikaitani / Kevin Ceder vs Andrew Armaneous / Iman Baghai2-6
W#1 Male SinglesKurt Nikaitani vs Andrew Armaneous6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 Seattle
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racket Scientists-Ungureanasu06251111120
2Free Birds06221414129
3Wing & Hoogs06152121140
4We Pan Boom-Jaspan0663030194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Meagan Milca
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Antonette Wood
published 3.5
2.70
Cheryl Borgonia
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Kurt Nikaitani
usually #1 Male Singles 50%, also #1 Male Doubles 50% · published 3
2.30
Laura Blanchard
published 2.5
1.92
Kevin Ceder
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Stuart Howe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meagan Milca + Kurt Nikaitani6165% games+9.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Meagan Milca
48W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Antonette Wood
152W–134L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Cheryl Borgonia
64W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Kurt Nikaitani
46W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.70
2.5
Laura Blanchard
7W–20L career · type S · no lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Kevin Ceder
3W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Stuart Howe
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.