Teams

10-LCaldwell-SVC

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-19vs 7-SGraff-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelinda Wright / Katie Naftel vs Julia Gabennesch / Abigail Weaver5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-14vs 4-KMcWhorter-HVCC 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Coward / Erin McElligott vs Anne Costello / Rhiannon Ludington6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2023-09-03vs 3-KLaan-Eno-6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Coward / Lisa Simmons vs Elizabeth Chan / Cathy Joyce1-6, 5-7
2023-08-29vs 5-LBaxter-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Naftel / Erin McElligott vs Melissa McCullough / Kelly Jarrett6-4, 7-5
2023-08-24vs 2-GLoFrese-Eno 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Naftel / Lisa Simmons vs Kimberly Donica / Gretchen LoFrese5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-01vs 1-CYu-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Coward / Laura Caldwell vs Megan Chiles / Caroline Yu0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Naftel / Lisa Simmons vs Amanda Pierce / Ilene Farkas6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Melissa Coward
usually #2 Doubles 69%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Katie Naftel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Erin McElligott
published
3.15
Laura Caldwell
published
2.94
Stephanie Jabusch
published
2.81
Kyle Wolf
published
2.77
2.69
Alison Moseley
published 3
Melinda Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Naftel + Erin McElligott1443% games−2.0% vs expected
Katie Naftel + Melissa Coward3350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melissa Coward
146W–74L career · 16 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Katie Naftel
57W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Erin McElligott
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Laura Caldwell
37W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.15
Stephanie Jabusch
22W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
Kyle Wolf
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Allison Stewart-Smull
1W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Alison Moseley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Melinda Wright
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.