Teams

Bryan - RS Clay

2026 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-06vs McElhany - PCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesDonna Richards / Mary Bryan vs Valerie Wilson / Kate Major6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAnn Scott / Sally Bergosh vs Sandra Wilson / Stephanie Boll3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Jones / Gina O'Neill vs Grace Harvey / Amanda Davies6-7, 1-6
2026-06-13vs McElhany - PCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonna Richards / Gina O'Neill vs Denise Prindiville / Jessica Lazzarino2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Scott / Sally Bergosh vs Sandra Wilson / Paige Davis6-4, 6-2
2026-05-19vs Tan - SHLLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Bryan / Ashley Wheeler vs Dodi Stringfellow / Rene Abel1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDonna Richards / Sharon Powell vs Chelsea Simpson / Kimberly Fortier3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCamille Neuner / Jill Kunkel vs Brooklyn Meadows / Cherie Tan3-6, 3-6
2026-05-12vs Nguyen - RS ClayLost 12
L#1 DoublesCamille Neuner / Allison George vs Jennifer Capozzoli / Amatul Bean3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGina O'Neill / Donna Richards vs Susan Barlow / Tanya Hughes6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Jones / Sally Bergosh vs Kayleigh Elliott / Gloria Langan4-6, 2-6
2026-05-05vs Essex - SHLWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Bryan / Donna Richards vs Barbie Doherty / Susan Rice6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGina O'Neill / Camille Neuner vs Theresa Smith / Kim Gall7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Ashley Wheeler
published 3.5
3.41
Jill Kunkel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Karen Penn
published
3.34
Gina O'Neill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Allison George
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ann Scott
published 3.5
Caroline Struck
published 3.5
3.21
Mary Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Donna Richards
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.03
Sally Bergosh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Camille Neuner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Sharon Powell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Wheeler
49W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Jill Kunkel
41W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
Karen Penn
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Gina O'Neill
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Allison George
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Ann Scott
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Struck
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Bryan
74W–123L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Donna Richards
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Sally Bergosh
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Camille Neuner
6W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Sharon Powell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.