Teams

SKY GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-31vs CP REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesPhilip Briere / Jeff Hutcheson vs Gene Martinez / Patrick Miller4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrooks Pearson vs Michael Evans6-1, 6-1
2024-05-28vs WP REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesElmo Morales / Philip Briere vs Noah Wasserman / David Nelson3-6, 3-6
2024-05-15vs ATC NAVYWon 10
W#1 SinglesPhilip Briere vs Scott Sigman6-4, 7-5
2024-05-07vs EM REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhilip Briere / Chad Cleveland vs Beattie Leonard / David Busam4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Garrison / Brooks Pearson vs Olaf Siverson / Martin Gaeth3-6, 2-6
2024-04-30vs CACM BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesChad Cleveland / Brooks Pearson vs ARTHUR VAUGHN / Scott Hampel6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesPhilip Briere vs Steven Naviaux5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-23vs CM NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesPhilip Briere / Andrew Hagen vs Taylor Weir / James Nottingham6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-16vs DTC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrooks Pearson / Chad Cleveland vs Daniel Thomas / Dan Smink6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Andrew Hagen
published 3.5
3.47
Chad Cleveland
published 3.5
3.38
Brooks Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Jeff Hutcheson
published
3.27
Scott Hermansen
published
3.26
Philip Briere
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Thomas Abell
published
3.21
David Garrison
published 3.5
3.15
Evan Dechtman
published 3.5
3.14
Ryan Goodale
published
2.78
Elmo Morales
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooks Pearson + Chad Cleveland4254% games+2.2% vs expected
Philip Briere + Brooks Pearson5257% gamesnot enough data
David Garrison + Scott Hermansen2351% gamesnot enough data
Brooks Pearson + Jeff Hutcheson134 matchesnot enough data
Scott Hermansen + Chad Cleveland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Hagen
34W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Chad Cleveland
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Brooks Pearson
97W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
Jeff Hutcheson
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Scott Hermansen
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Philip Briere
61W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
Thomas Abell
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
David Garrison
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Evan Dechtman
19W–31L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Ryan Goodale
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.14
Elmo Morales
6W–26L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.