Teams

Burns-Congressional 3.5

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesLauren Billings / Jennifer Hemann vs Leanne Bortner / Bettina Lynn6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Burns / Christy Sporidis vs Karen Vladeck / Maureen Parkinson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChrista Meyers / Katy Cannon vs Tiffany Rowan / Sydney Rowan2-6, 1-6
2024-10-31vs Dobson - LakewoodLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Byrne / Jennifer Najar vs Carol Maio / Jody Sklar2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAditi Arora / Katy Cannon vs Anne Porto / Alisa Talisman3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRobin Crawford / Jennifer Hemann vs Jennifer Shure / Sharon Zissman6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jennifer Hemann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Christy Sporidis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Andrea Cecchi
published 3.5
Catherine Byrne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christa Meyers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Claudia Helmig
published 3.5
3.13
Jennifer Najar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Rachel Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Aditi Arora
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Minich
published
Katy Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lauren Billings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Crawford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracie Rolle
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hemann
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Christy Sporidis
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Cecchi
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Byrne
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Christa Meyers
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Claudia Helmig
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Najar
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Rachel Burns
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Aditi Arora
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jean-Marie Fernandez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Minich
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katy Cannon
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Billings
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Robin Crawford
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Tracie Rolle
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.