Teams

Lemmons/Bachman Day

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 65 & over · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lemmons/Bachman Day000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Joyce Jordan
published
3.29
3.24
Paula Bachman
published
3.15
Susan Lemmons
published
3.13
Sylvia Jones
published
3.10
Janet Harbeck
published
3.06
Susan Catalano
published
2.88
Georgina Dillon
published
2.88
Sharon Sypniewski
published
2.82
Linda Young
published
2.82
Ginger Wessell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Bachman + Joyce Jordan9655% games+11.5% vs expected
Susan Catalano + Janet Harbeck3348% gamesnot enough data
Susan Lemmons + Joyce Jordan4170% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Buckelew Burt + Janet Harbeck314 matchesnot enough data
Georgina Dillon + Janet Harbeck033 matchesnot enough data
Paula Bachman + Ginger Wessell123 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Buckelew Burt + Joyce Jordan123 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Jordan + Janet Harbeck123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Jordan
29W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Laurie Buckelew Burt
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Paula Bachman
14W–17L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Susan Lemmons
15W–13L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Sylvia Jones
20W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Janet Harbeck
9W–18L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Susan Catalano
10W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Georgina Dillon
2W–14L career · no lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
Sharon Sypniewski
9W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Linda Young
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Ginger Wessell
18W–12L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.