Teams

Yu.Barthes18C6.5

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-02vs Cr.Smith18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Newson / Jill Salstrand vs Melissa Graham / Callie Ward1-6, 2-6
2023-09-28vs Ra.Matthews18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarlea Ward / Catherine Chavez vs Martha Sanders / April Taylor0-6, 2-6
2023-09-25vs Lu.Lav18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaula Westregard Bjorklund / Jill Salstrand vs Daphne Driscoll / Stacey Giglio1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Newson / Marlea Ward vs Tara Spina / Gretchen Swank4-6, 4-6
2023-09-11vs Jo.Zorzi18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaula Westregard Bjorklund / Jill Salstrand vs Samantha Starr / Leigh Watson6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarlea Ward / Monika Ahmad vs Leslie Damiano / Veronica Glass6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesYuliya Barthes / Julie Newson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-28vs Me.George18C6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPaula Westregard Bjorklund / Jill Salstrand vs Jeanette Gerould / Joy Cooper0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYuliya Barthes / Marlea Ward vs Maggie Patterson / Kim Peters2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMonika Ahmad / Katherine Messenger vs Melissa George / Shannon Parham1-6, 3-6
2023-08-21vs Ki.Johnson18C6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPaula Westregard Bjorklund / Jill Salstrand vs Meike Schacht / Caroline Fungaroli0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYuliya Barthes / Julie Newson vs Amy Merdes / Ngoc Tran0-6, 6-7
2023-08-14vs Le.Veit18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesYuliya Barthes / Julie Newson vs Caroline Wall / Melissa Ferrell6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaula Westregard Bjorklund / Jill Salstrand vs Kelly Burkhardt / Ameshia Turlington6-4, 7-6
2023-08-07vs Je.Mitchell18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesJulie Newson / Catherine Chavez vs Lisa Lathram / Garnett Webb1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarlea Ward / Monika Ahmad vs Christine Mccorquodale / Carol Rosser7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Monika Ahmad
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Julie Newson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.97
Yuliya Barthes
published
2.87
Jill Salstrand
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Marlea Ward
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Catherine Chavez
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Monika Ahmad
38W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Julie Newson
70W–78L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Yuliya Barthes
6W–20L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Jill Salstrand
71W–77L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Marlea Ward
60W–68L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Catherine Chavez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.