Teams

SGV Forty Love Force-Laguna-WN/SU4

2026 Adult Division - 40& Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesJasmine Dai / Tai Sisson vs Nancy Carell / Jennifer Prakash2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWenli Chen vs Roseann DeRosa6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmi Belcher / Julie Flygare vs Jennifer Lichtman / Jennifer Toplitzky6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKarla Garcia / Tai Sisson vs Kristina Chen / Christine Chen1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Brawley vs Jennifer Avila3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeann McCormick / Diana Laguna vs Gloria Geller / Jennifer Lichtman4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarites Killion / Leslie Croyder vs Theona Zhordania / Xiaochun Wang7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJasmine Dai / Whitney Johnson vs Christine Chen / Kristina Chen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Brawley vs Brynna Pietz6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDiana Laguna / Tai Sisson vs Nancy Carell / Jennifer Prakash5-7, 4-5
L#3 DoublesJulie Flygare / Cynthia Garcia vs Rebecca Mall / Monica Johnson5-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesDeann McCormick / Jasmine Dai vs Gloria Geller / Vicki Peterson6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSarah Obrien vs Jennifer Avila0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWhitney Johnson / Jennifer Brawley vs Nancy Carell / Rebecca Mall2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKarla Garcia / Wenli Chen vs Christine Chen / Mindy Pfenning7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAlison Harma / Leslie Croyder vs Ghia Godfree / Linda Lyke6-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKarla Garcia / Cynthia Garcia vs Monica Johnson / Gloria Geller3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLeslie Croyder vs Stacey Lam6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTai Sisson / Diana Laguna vs Ghia Godfree / Linda Lyke7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJasmine Dai / Wenli Chen vs Jennifer Avila / Claudia Ibarra3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesKarla Garcia / Caridad Coto vs Vicki Peterson / Brynna Pietz3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Brawley vs Jennifer Avila6-4, 5-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Flygare / Deann McCormick vs Stacey Lam / Claudia Ibarra7-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesDiana Laguna / Sarah Obrien vs Theona Zhordania / Roseann DeRosa7-6, 4-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · SGV - Women 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SU1052151329238
2SGV Forty Love Force-Laguna-WN/SU425131535272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Tai Sisson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Jennifer Brawley
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.10
Diana Laguna
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.05
Jasmine Dai
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.03
Alison Harma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Caridad Coto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Leslie Croyder
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Deann McCormick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Julie Flygare
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Ami Belcher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
Wenli Chen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.79
Sarah Obrien
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Marites Killion
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Karla Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Laguna + Tai Sisson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tai Sisson
249W–74L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
4.32
Jennifer Brawley
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
4.14
4.5
Diana Laguna
3W–7L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
4.10
Jasmine Dai
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Alison Harma
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Caridad Coto
1W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
Leslie Croyder
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Deann McCormick
102W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.96
Julie Flygare
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
4.5
Ami Belcher
60W–89L career · 1 line in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.94
Wenli Chen
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.85
Sarah Obrien
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Marites Killion
115W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Karla Garcia
2W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.