Teams

Hot Shots

2023 Montgomery Tri-Level Mixed 18 & Over · Montgomery Tri-Level Mixed 10.0, 9.0, 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-12-17vs My Kinda MischiefLost 01
L#2 DoublesDuane Wright / Sarah Monsheimer vs Byron Levy / Tara Jakubik2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-12-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Rosen / Sarah Monsheimer vs Eve Helmer / Matthew Geppi2-6, 3-6
2023-12-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Lee / Jenna Gietl vs Daniel Park / Michele Brammer6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-12-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDuane Wright / Jenna Gietl vs Matthew Geppi / Eve Helmer3-6, 4-6
2023-11-20vs My Kinda MischiefLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Monsheimer / David Lee vs Tara Jakubik / Michael Mahaney7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2023-11-17vs My Kinda MischiefLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Lee / Jenna Gietl vs Yiran Liu / Ashley Xie1-6, 2-6
2023-11-07vs My Kinda MischiefLost 01
L#2 DoublesJenna Gietl / David Rosen vs Ashley Xie / Michael Mahaney1-6, 2-6
2023-11-05vs My Kinda MischiefLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Rosen / Sarah Monsheimer vs Caitlin Lee / Mehrban Iranshad4-6, 2-6
2023-10-17vs Super Sac SacLost 02
L#1 DoublesAzan Piperno / Jenna Gietl vs Inese Williamson / Gregory Rabinovich1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Lee / Sarah Monsheimer vs Daniel Park / Michele Brammer6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Tri-Level Mixed 10.0, 9.0, 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Azan Piperno
published 5
4.58
Erika Trost
published 5
4.31
Jenna Gietl
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Duane Wright
published 4.5
4.15
Sarah Monsheimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.74
Cecilia Jones
published 4
3.71
Michele Bloom
published
3.71
Henry Forster
published 4
3.66
Trevor Lessard
published
Katya White
published
Roxanne Henshall
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Azan Piperno
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
4.59
5
Erika Trost
383W–194L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.58
4.5
Jenna Gietl
134W–117L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Duane Wright
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Sarah Monsheimer
45W–80L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
4.15
4
Cecilia Jones
48W–52L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Michele Bloom
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Henry Forster
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Trevor Lessard
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.66
Katya White
27W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roxanne Henshall
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.