Teams

CBeaird

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-09vs ERC-KGillispieWon 10
W#3 DoublesMeta Bartley / Caroline Beaird vs Kacey Barcliff / Carol Ann Mcmillan6-2, 6-2
2022-10-02vs BWilhelm Combo 5.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesDana Aderhold / Kathryn Shields vs Silpa Yalamanchili / Kristin Blankenhorn Tharpe6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-18vs JBoda Fall 5.5 ComboWon 10
W#2 DoublesDana Aderhold / Kathryn Shields vs June Boda / Melissa Weber6-3, 6-0
2022-09-11vs ACuni/Lynch: 7OaksWon 20
W#2 DoublesLeila Thomas / Caroline Beaird vs Elizabeth Lindsay / Kay Bonavita6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCatherine George / Claudia Cadet vs Carrie Martinelli / Shannon Strauss6-0, 6-1
2022-08-27vs IPSpellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDana Aderhold / Kathryn Shields vs Pamela Spell / Shana Lentz7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill Cramer / Jackie Morse vs Carol Abercrombie / Jennifer Kazmierczak6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-08-14vs ICWaychoff Fall ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine George / Kathryn Shields vs Melissa Cleary / Krystal Glover3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Morse / Jill Cramer vs Katie Warren / Elizabeth Rupert6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMeta Bartley / Caroline Beaird vs Monica Gardner / Grace Poole6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-08-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesJill Cramer / Claudia Cadet vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Leila Thomas
published
2.84
Dana Aderhold
published 3
2.80
2.78
Catherine George
published 3
2.77
Kathryn Shields
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.68
Leigh Stallings
published
2.66
Claudia Cadet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Caroline Beaird
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.48
Jackie Morse
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Manjula Nagaraja
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Beaird + Jackie Morse3255% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Cadet + Jackie Morse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leila Thomas
14W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
3.59
3
Dana Aderhold
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Caroline Braswell
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Catherine George
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Kathryn Shields
88W–91L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Leigh Stallings
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Claudia Cadet
38W–39L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Caroline Beaird
46W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Jackie Morse
27W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Manjula Nagaraja
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.