Teams

MBland-CHTC

2026 Eno River Mixed 40 & Over · 40 & Over Mixed 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-29vs TEdwards-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Bland / Katherine Bland vs Dave Thomas / Altagracia Evert3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCHARLES ENDERLINE / Tracy Kinsey vs Jeff Denhard / Tracy Stefan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEd Slanker / Mary Griffiths vs David Nagelhout / Tynita Edwards6-1, 6-2
2026-07-22vs JYoung.40-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Bland / Lisa Baxter vs Mark Piper / Kellie Johnson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Hess / Maribeth Hamilton vs Marvin Davis / Annaliese Gresham6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEd Slanker / Mary Griffiths vs Bill Schaller / Liz Schaller6-3, 6-2
2026-07-15vs YDeaver-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Baxter / Mark Bland vs Diane Allen / David Bautz6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMaribeth Hamilton / John Hess vs Jennifer Magee / FJ Magee7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Enderline / CHARLES ENDERLINE vs Matt Carter / Tammy Hood6-0, 6-2
2026-07-08vs SGraff.40.3.0-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Bland / Tracy Kinsey vs Matthew Feldt / Sara Lawrence3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJohn Hess / Maribeth Hamilton vs Leon Grodski Barrera / Kristin Isaacs4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesFranck Seguin / Mary Griffiths vs Kari Lovetinsky / Rafael DeJesus2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-24vs NLetts-UNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaribeth Hamilton / John Hess vs Lisa Andrew / Tim Turner6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Enderline / CHARLES ENDERLINE vs Vera Halpern / Brett Bushnell4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Kinsey / Mark Bland vs Mia Pizzagalli / Tony Perucci6-3, 6-1
2026-06-17vs LGilchrist-CHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Bland / Katherine Bland vs Laura Porter / Tom Porter6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFranck Seguin / Maribeth Hamilton vs Aaron Meadows / Jessica Meadows6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCHARLES ENDERLINE / Tracy Kinsey vs Kara Andrews / Justin Andrews6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-10vs AHabib-HRLost 12
W#1 DoublesKatherine Bland / Mark Bland vs Kim Cabelka / James Bowers7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaribeth Hamilton / CHARLES ENDERLINE vs Melanie Wall / George Corbett4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTracy Kinsey / Ed Slanker vs Faten Habib / Brian Reo6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-03vs TEdwards-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Bland / Katherine Bland vs David Evert / Altagracia Evert2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCHARLES ENDERLINE / Elizabeth Enderline vs Dirk Kumashiro / Lori Sloan6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrent Griffiths / Mary Griffiths vs Dave Thomas / Linda Nagelhout4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Mixed 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Lisa Baxter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Mary Griffiths
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
CHARLES ENDERLINE
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Ed Slanker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Maribeth Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.75
Elizabeth Enderline
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
John Hess
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Mark Bland
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
2.62
Franck Seguin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Pedro Pinto
published
Brent Griffiths
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Joanna Bomberg
published
Katherine Bland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Enderline + CHARLES ENDERLINE7855% games+6.5% vs expected
Mark Bland + Katherine Bland1450% gamesnot enough data
Maribeth Hamilton + John Hess224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Baxter
92W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Mary Griffiths
29W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
CHARLES ENDERLINE
54W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Ed Slanker
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Maribeth Hamilton
43W–56L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Elizabeth Enderline
93W–149L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
John Hess
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Mark Bland
16W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Franck Seguin
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Pedro Pinto
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.47
2.5
Brent Griffiths
0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joanna Bomberg
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Katherine Bland
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.