Teams

Guy - Highland Country Club

2026 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 3.5 Adult Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-17vs Coker - Methodist UniversityLost 14
L#1 DoublesDaniel Hurley / Karl Molnar vs Aj Balsa / Quincy Jones6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Stout vs LUKE TURNER3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKenneth Barefoot / Matthew Tatman vs Thomas Coker / Jared Boggan3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesFranklin Clark vs James Heinen6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDaniel Gordon / Blake Joeckel vs Nirav Bhavsar / Harold Miller0-6, 4-6
2026-04-29vs Coker - Methodist UniversityWon 32
L#1 DoublesBlake Joeckel / Daniel Hurley vs Quincy Jones / Thomas Coker2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Stout vs LUKE TURNER6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Tatman / Daniel Gordon vs Jared Boggan / Nirav Bhavsar1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMitch Guy vs James Heinen7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKenneth Barefoot / Robert Hammond vs Alex Hang / Harold Miller6-2, 6-2
2026-04-22vs Coker - Methodist UniversityLost 14
L#1 DoublesFranklin Clark / Robert Hammond vs Aj Balsa / Andrew Wolters1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMitch Guy vs Adam Embler3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKarl Molnar / Benjamin Stout vs James Heinen / LUKE TURNER3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCharles Gardner vs Quincy Jones6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Levine / Matthew Tatman vs Alex Hang / Nirav Bhavsar6-4, 6-1
2026-04-06vs Coker - Methodist UniversityWon 32
W#1 DoublesKarl Molnar / Franklin Clark vs Thomas Coker / Andrew Wolters6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDaniel Hurley vs Adam Embler3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Gordon / Robert Hammond vs Aj Balsa / Quincy Jones2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesCharles Gardner vs Jared Boggan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKenneth Barefoot / Matthew Tatman vs Nirav Bhavsar / Harold Miller6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-18vs Coker - Methodist UniversityLost 05
L#1 DoublesMitch Guy / Robert Hammond vs Aj Balsa / Thomas Coker3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCharles Gardner vs Adam Embler1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBlake Joeckel / Benjamin Levine vs Jared Boggan / Andrew Wolters1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDaniel Hurley vs Quincy Jones6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKenneth Barefoot / Karl Molnar vs Harold Miller / Curtis Forte5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-03-11vs Coker - Methodist UniversityLost 23
L#1 DoublesFranklin Clark / Daniel Hurley vs Aj Balsa / Curtis Forte4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRobert Hammond vs Adam Embler1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKarl Molnar / Benjamin Stout vs Jared Boggan / Andrew Wolters6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesCharles Gardner vs Alex Hang6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDaniel Gordon / Blake Joeckel vs Thomas Coker / Harold Miller0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Mitch Guy
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.36
Franklin Clark
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Charles Gardner
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Andrew Pennink
published 3.5
3.17
Robert Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.16
Karl Molnar
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.15
Daniel Hurley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Matthew Tatman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Kenneth Barefoot
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
Benjamin Stout
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.82
Blake Joeckel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.78
Daniel Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Benjamin Levine
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karl Molnar + Benjamin Stout224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mitch Guy
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Franklin Clark
3W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Charles Gardner
2W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Andrew Pennink
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Hammond
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.17
3
Karl Molnar
37W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.16
3.5
Daniel Hurley
0W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Matthew Tatman
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Kenneth Barefoot
13W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Benjamin Stout
8W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3.5
Blake Joeckel
3W–15L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.82
3.5
Daniel Gordon
0W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.78
3
Benjamin Levine
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.